---
title: "Agents Are Here"
description: "Late last year I started writing im-out-on-agents. Agents sucked, the models were good, but there was still something missing between the harnesses and the..."
date: 2026-04-10
published: false
tags:
- ai
- llm
- agentic
- agents
template: blog-post
---
Late last year I started writing I'm Out On Agents. Agents sucked, the
models were good, but there was still something missing between the harnesses
and the models. They could write good code, they could do some debugging and
exploring, but they were too good a fucking up the whole project to be useful.
They could crank out Green Field POC's like nobody's business, but they created
so much mess in brown field projects that it was easier to chat and edit
yourself.
The vibe coding era—before the breakthrough—meant accepting code you didn't
read. Theo's framework mattered then: don't land in "don't
know, don't care, mission critical." Most of us were stuck there. Developers
naturally got great tools. Artists got prompt
engineering. The difference in how we approached AI shaped everything that
came next.
The Beautiful Glitch - Gemini
## The Inflection Point
It's very well agreed on that the inflection point for most people happened
with Anthropic Opus 4.5 in late Nov 2025. Early adopters probably noticed
right away and shouted from the rooftops how good it was. But we've all heard
that developers have 6 months before ai writes all the code for years, so this
felt like the rest of the noise.
Hitting the December slowdown many of us hit code freezes at work. We
completely disconnect from work for the last Week and come back in January.
During this time, its very common for us to try out new tools, new techniques
work on side projects, create POC for that thing we never have time for. While
it looks like less features coming into the apps we support this is an
important time for us to explore and reflect.
December wasn't just about the models getting better. The tooling exploded.
I started noticing variants popping up—fast, slow,
thinking modes. Anthropic was super generous with a free tier giving out huge
levels of free tokens at the time. So many of us laughed and threw it at our
side projects expecting the normal garbage output, but maybe some good ideas to
come from it. But that's not what was happening anymore, somehow these agents
do some real work, follow plans and stick to scope really well. And if you lay
out a big enough plan they tended to keep cooking and completing features.
This was the shift I started documenting in I'm In-ish On Agents. "Context
is king, good plans are paramount, syntax barely matter."
## January 2026
_flu season_
For me and many others around the country we were hit with a rough flu season,
kicking in and draining us mentally for a good month or so. I wanted to work,
I was getting excited about some projects and wanted to get them going, but I
was constantly wiped and had no capacity. I had no ability to think on complex
tasks, I was coughing all the time, just trying to survive, but yet wanted to
do something. I started doing some small clean up, some work on side projects.
January was when I wrote Stop Using Boomer Ai. The chat-copy-paste era
ended for me. If you were still doing that, you were doing it wrong.
Somewhere in the fever haze, I started figuring out the harness. Not just
prompting—planning. My First Agentic Workflow documents the /init,
AGENTS.md, the whole ritual: issue → plan → execute → review.
At this point I was still afraid of really letting agents cut loose on
something meaningful, something that users depend on. But the framework was
taking shape. "There is no free lunch. Software engineering is still very
much needed, but the work is switching."
## February 2026
_what just happened?_
It got fast. Too fast.
Agent Management Is Exhausting
Claude could implement features faster than I could research and raise issues.
It's like trying to speedrun a Minecraft seed when you just figured out how to
craft a pickaxe. "Depending on the day, agents move so damn fast. I can barely
research, find, and raise issues as fast as Claude can implement features and
fixes."
The exhaustion was real—managing these things stretches a different part of
your brain than you're used to using. "I had a session yesterday where the
context got poisoned with a wrong assumption. The agent spent 20 minutes
building on that false premise before I caught it. That's 20 minutes of
perfectly executed code solving the wrong problem entirely."
This is when I realized babysitting was the wrong frame.
Theo's quote haunted me: developers average 10 well-tested lines of code per day,
Opus 3.5 made him 10k LOC in a day. "Stop babysitting your agents, treat them
like a real team and they will reward you. You need a tool for planning and
tracking, otherwise you are playing babysitter rather than Product Manager."
## yes or --dangerously-accept
Somewhere between February's chaos and March's clarity, the workflow
solidified. The yes-or-die moment. The --dangerously-accept flag.
From How To Run 5 Agents In Parallel Feb 2026 Edition: "Planning is the
core of what it takes to keep agents running... Agents need something to do,
telling them to turn the circle green, then blue, then to a rectangle, is not
it." With a good plan, well-scoped and documented, they'll keep working. The
question becomes: are you reviewing every line, or are you managing plans?
This is when you decide. This is when the frame shifts from "will it break"
to "is it solving the right problem."
## March 2026
_the productivity paradox_
I built one of the biggest PRs I've ever done professionally. Fifty commands
refactored, stdout/stderr contracts established, Unix-pipe friendly—all
patterns from clig.dev, implemented consistently.
The agents cranked out more code than I could have typed in months. "There's a
lot that's getting done that there's no way I could do alone, it would take a
full team with heavy coordination."
But here's the thing: [[thinking-about-ai-productivity-again|it's low value
work]]. "This is all good work. It will make the product consistent,
repeatable, expected, and most of all boring. But its low value work. We
wouldn't have likely put humans on this work wholesale and fixed critical paths
as they came up."
Am I more productive? "I'm definitely doing more, there
are more lines of code... but its hard to sus out the real productivity from
the noise."
Around this time, I realized: I
don't want someone else running my agents. "I don't want to review the mass
of changes clobbered across the codebase... If someone is going to be stirring
the slop in my product, I want it to be me."
## April 2026
_here now_
The agents are here. They're not what we thought they'd be in 2024, not what
I thought they'd be in August 2025.
They're exhausting. They're fast. They require a different kind of management.
[[the-ai-wars-are-so-much-worse-than-the-framework-wars|The pace is worse than
the framework wars ever were.]]
But they're here. And the work keeps changing. Expectations are changing, the
way work is completed is changing, and we are all here trying to figure out what
this looks like moving forward.
## Closing the editor
The editor is closed more often now. I still peek in, still review when it
matters, still own my words on this site. But the work happens
differently.
If you want to see how this evolved, start with I'm In-ish On Agents, check
out My First Agentic Workflow for the mechanics, or read
Agent Management Is Exhausting when you're tired.
Closing the Editor - Gemini